Skip to content
All posts

PCAF Explained

PCAF (Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials) is a global initiative helping financial institutions measure and report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from their loans and investments. It provides a standardised framework aligned with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, making it easier for organisations to track emissions, set reduction targets, and align with the Paris Agreement.

Key Highlights:

  • Purpose: Helps financial institutions measure financed emissions, which are often 700+ times larger than operational emissions.

  • Framework: Covers 6 asset types (e.g., mortgages, vehicle loans) and emerging categories like sovereign debt and insurance.

  • Adoption: Over 550 institutions (as of Feb 2025) use PCAF to improve transparency and accountability.

  • Benefits: Supports target setting, risk management, and compliance with climate regulations.

  • Challenges: Data quality issues, resource demands, and reputational risks.

Quick Overview of PCAF Standards:

PCAF

Component

Purpose

Example Focus Areas

Financed Emissions (Part A)

Measures GHG from investments

Asset classes like real estate

Facilitated Emissions (Part B)

Tracks emissions from capital markets

Underwriting and advisory activities

Insurance Emissions (Part C)

Evaluates insurance-related emissions

Re/insurance underwriting

PCAF is a practical tool for financial institutions to start measuring their climate impact and contribute to global climate goals.

PCAF's GHG Reporting Standard

Standard Basics

The PCAF Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard offers financial institutions a clear way to measure and report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions tied to their portfolios[5]. It builds on the GHG Protocol and aligns with the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard for Category 15 investment activities[4]. Financed emissions often dwarf operational emissions - by more than 700 times in some cases[1]. This highlights the massive influence financial institutions have on climate change through their investment choices. The standard is divided into three main parts, each addressing a specific area.

Main Elements

The standard is structured into three key sections:

Component

Purpose

Key Focus Areas

Part A: Financed Emissions

Measures GHG emissions from investments

Covers seven asset classes and emission removals

Part B: Facilitated Emissions

Tracks emissions from capital markets

Focuses on capital market issuances and their effects

Part C: Insurance-Associated Emissions

Evaluates the environmental impact of insurance activities

Includes re/insurance underwriting emissions

This framework allows institutions to evaluate their climate impact across various operations. Since the Paris Climate Agreement, major banks have funnelled over $4.6 trillion into the fossil fuel industry[2], emphasising the urgent need for consistent measurement and transparency.

Why Standards Matter

  • Assessing climate-related risks in financial portfolios

  • Setting science-based targets to cut emissions

  • Offering a consistent framework for transparent reporting to stakeholders

  • Supporting climate strategies with accurate data

"In order for banks to reduce their impact on global warming, we need to be able to measure what that impact actually is. We recognise the Dutch founders for initiating the open-sourced methodology that PCAF provides as a major step forward." – Keith Mestrich, CEO Amalgamated Bank[4]

PCAF also provides regional implementation teams to assist institutions with technical support and feedback, ensuring the standard is applied effectively[1].

Introduction to Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF)

PCAF Asset Types and Methods

PCAF builds on its framework by categorising assets and offering specific methods for measuring emissions tied to financing activities.

6 Core Asset Types

Each asset type requires a tailored approach to measure financed emissions effectively.

Asset Class

Description

Key Measurement Focus

Listed Equity & Corporate Bonds

Publicly traded securities

Emissions based on market share

Business Loans & Unlisted Equity

Financing for private companies

Attribution using revenue data

Project Finance

Funding for specific projects

Emissions directly tied to projects

Commercial Real Estate

Income-generating properties

Energy use in buildings

Mortgages

Loans for residential properties

Energy efficiency of homes

Motor Vehicle Loans

Vehicle financing

Emissions ratings of financed vehicles

These six categories account for more than 99% of the emissions linked to financial institutions' activities[6].

Emerging Asset Categories

PCAF is actively expanding its methodology to include additional financial activities. Current work is centered on three main areas:

  • Sovereign Debt: Calculating emissions from government bonds and loans.

  • Capital Market Facilitation: Measuring emissions linked to underwriting and advisory roles.

  • Insurance-Related Activities: Assessing emissions from insurance underwriting.

By March 2023, 373 organisations were using PCAF's methods[3]. These new categories highlight the demand for accurate and actionable measurement tools.

How to Apply PCAF Methods

Financial institutions can adopt PCAF methods by focusing on three main principles:

  • Data Quality Assessment: Use reliable data sources, improve data quality over time, and aim for accuracy and completeness.

  • Attribution Calculation: Apply attribution factors specific to each asset class, ensure consistent measurement practices, and document the methods used.

  • Practical Application: For example, a $10M loan to a company with $100M in capital and annual emissions of 50,000 metric tons, using a 10% attribution factor, would result in 5,000 metric tons of financed emissions[7].

 

PCAF and Related Standards

Collaborating with GRI, CDP, and PRI

PCAF works closely with leading climate reporting frameworks to streamline the measurement and reporting of financed emissions. This unified approach reduces duplicate efforts and ensures consistency across various standards.

Here’s how PCAF integrates with key frameworks:

Framework

How It Connects to PCAF

Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP)

Introduced financed emissions questions in 2020, recommending PCAF's framework

Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi)

Relies on PCAF data for setting emissions reduction targets

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

Incorporates PCAF metrics into broader sustainability reporting practices

UN Principles (PRI/PRB)

Facilitates emissions measurement for investment portfolios

These partnerships highlight PCAF's central role in supporting global climate goals.

Aligning with the Paris Agreement

PCAF helps financial institutions align with the Paris Agreement by offering standardised methods for calculating emissions, enabling science-based target setting, and tracking progress toward net-zero goals by 2050.

So far, over 280 financial institutions - representing financed assets exceeding $75 trillion - have adopted PCAF standards. This demonstrates its growing influence in driving climate action [8]. With these achievements as a foundation, PCAF is preparing for further advancements.

Future Plans for PCAF

PCAF is set to expand its framework and deepen its integration with international standards. Upcoming initiatives include:

  • Aligning with International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) guidelines

  • Coordinating with the EU Taxonomy and Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR)

  • Launching an improved data quality scoring system in collaboration with CDP

"PCAF continues to work towards establishing greater accountability in the GHG accounting space. As the Principal Founding Data Partner, S&P Global looks forward to supporting the initiative in these efforts." [9]

Looking ahead, PCAF aims to enhance data quality, cover more asset classes, and strengthen regulatory alignment. These efforts will help financial institutions better understand and manage their climate impact.

PCAF Pros and Cons

Looking closely at PCAF shows both its benefits and the challenges that come with its adoption, shaping how institutions can use it effectively.

Benefits for Users

PCAF helps financial institutions measure, report, and manage financed emissions, keeping them aligned with climate goals.

Benefit

Description

Example

Target Setting

Assists in setting goals based on climate science.

Achmea's 50% reduction target for financed emissions by 2030[10]

Innovation Support

Encourages development of green financial tools.

ABN AMRO's Sustainable Investment Tool for energy assessments in real estate[10]

Regulatory Compliance

Helps meet new climate-related regulations.

BNG Bank's detailed carbon footprint reporting[10]

Risk Management

Identifies risks like stranded assets early.

Early detection of climate-related investment risks[10]

Common Problems

Adopting PCAF isn't without its hurdles:

  • Data Quality Issues: In many areas, emissions reporting is voluntary, leading to gaps or inconsistencies in data[11].

  • Resource Demands: Setting up a financed emissions program requires significant investment in staff, training, and technology[11].

  • Reputational Risks: Sharing emissions data and targets can invite public scrutiny[11].

"Measuring financed emissions cannot be done in a silo. Engaging cross-functional stakeholders from each of the three lines of defence, including early and meaningful engagement of the business teams, can help improve measurement accuracy and organisational cohesion toward target management and net zero."

Despite these challenges, some institutions have successfully leveraged PCAF.

Success Stories

Here are examples of institutions effectively using PCAF:

  1. ABN AMRO Bank
    Their Sustainable Investment Tool for commercial real estate includes:

    • Energy label ratings for properties.

    • Tailored energy-saving recommendations.

    • Investment cost and payback period calculations.

    • Carbon reduction estimates[10].

  2. BNG Bank
    By incorporating PCAF into its reporting cycle, BNG Bank provides detailed carbon footprint data for its credit portfolio, ensuring greater transparency[10].

Next Steps

Using the PCAF framework and standards outlined earlier, financial institutions can take practical steps to measure and disclose their financed emissions.

Main Points

PCAF offers a consistent method for tracking and reporting financed emissions, which often far exceed operational emissions. Accurate measurement is crucial [1].

Here are the main elements of PCAF implementation:

Component

Description

Impact

Standardization

Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard

Ensures uniform measurement across institutions

Regional Focus

Teams in Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and North America

Adapts standards to different local needs [4]

Data Quality

Gradual improvement approach

Allows institutions to start with current data while enhancing systems [1]

With these elements in mind, institutions can take the following steps to begin implementation.

Getting Started

Implementing PCAF involves three straightforward steps:

  1. Initial Assessment
    Reach out to PCAF at info@carbonaccountingfinancials.com to get detailed guidance on implementation [12].

  2. Formal Commitment
    Submit a letter committing to measure and disclose GHG emissions within three years [12].

  3. Implementation Process
    Join a regional team to receive technical support and tailor the framework to your local context [12].

"It's time for carbon accounting to become business as usual in financial institutions. PCAF provides an easy way to get started, regardless of the size or location of your organisation. We urge others to take the opportunity that PCAF presents, to share your learning from doing so and together we can play our part in the urgent effort to transition to a sustainable, low carbon future."
– Jellie Banga, COO, Triodos Bank [12]

Tools and Software

To simplify the process, consider using specialised software. For example, Emerald Power's Portfolio Management software offers:

  • Collection of emissions data across portfolios

  • Standardised data formatting

  • Access to emission factor libraries from sources like DEFRA, IEA, IPCC, and GHG Protocol [13]

When selecting software, keep these factors in mind:

Factor

Consideration

Benefit

Scalability

Handles growing data volumes

Prepares for future needs

Integration

Works with your existing systems

Simplifies your workflow

Cost Range

Costs range from a few thousand to several hundred thousand dollars annually

Fits different budgets [14]